La autotomia
Lizard season has been upon the Bunker for a few weeks now. Several
mornings recently I’ve opened my door to find one basking on the step in the
early sun, and I can hear them scuttle from my footsteps to and from the
washing line round the back, just about catching a glimpse of their brown tails
vanishing rustling into the flowerbed.
The Bunker, by the way, is the on-site teachers’ accommodation
where I live. It’s so called because it has the grey, boxy and (almost)
windowless appearance of somewhere you might shelter from a nuclear blast. It’s
a bit like living in one of those big self-storage lockers, or a shipping
container. Underneath the mattress on my bed previous inhabitants have scrawled
the length of their stint, in a way that is just a bit too reminiscent of a
prison cell. In all honesty it’s not too bad. It does in fact have windows,
though not on the lizard side as this faces the school and the car park, and
presumably the builders thought that parents might not enjoy the sight of the
adults in whose care they were leaving their children wandering around in their
pants. The fact that a good deal of the light from the window side is blocked
out by two large billboards is probably a small price to pay for not being on
constant show, and for not having to wear trousers the whole damn time. The
kitchen is small but adequate; I have a choice of two sofas; a bathroom with
what appears to be a regulated supply of hot water; even a spare bedroom,
albeit containing nothing other than a bed. It’s the sort of place that would
set you back about £1250 a month in London, and my commute is roughly two
minutes. Despite this I am often late. Plus, I have a constant supply of
rosemary as a bush grows by the front door, along with some pungent smelling
pink flower with mint-like leaves, and a variety of other foliage that is home
to big lumbering grasshoppers, hummingbird moths, a small yellow bird that I
think is a kind of wagtail and of course lizards, of at least two different species.
On the whole when you open the door on them, the startled
lizard hides in the nearest shrub but when last week Rachael –visiting from
some windswept backwater called Madrid – interrupted one in its morning sunning,
he ran not back into the undergrowth but inside the flat. Anyone who knows a
bit about geckos and other small lizards will know that they can shed their tails
when attacked, a move which either leaves the predator with only the tail to chew
on, or at least creates enough confusion to allow the reptile time to
escape – in this case to the initial safety of behind the sideboard and then
inside the electric heater, from where he had to be ejected in a patch of flowerbed,
by which time we had missed our train. This is autotomy – self amputation – and
is practised by various animals including several different kinds of lizard (in
this case probably a Mediterranean house gecko), salamanders, some spiders, and
the African spiny mouse, which can shed its skin in order to evade capture. When
a bee leaves its sting in you this is also autotomy, although given that the
sting also seems to take with it the insect’s internal organs, resulting in
death, I assume in this instance the goal is not individual survival but the
protection of the group. Good old bees.
Turns out some geckos will perform autotomy not only if
attacked but also if particularly freaked out, so it would seem the gecko that
lives outside my flat is quite highly strung – assuming that Rachael didn't try
to attack him – and was so startled by the opening door that he shed his tail.
Like a really extreme version of wetting yourself. Either that or she trod on
it. Also, what I didn't know is that – in order to distract the predator - the
rejected tail retains movement, and writhes around for a few minutes
independent of the body, which although interesting is a bit grimy. Don’t worry
though, because the lizard might come back later and eat it.
So there you go; autotomy in neurotic house geckos. Every
day’s a school day.
El vampiro
There’s that phrase or possibly psalm that says: ‘Out of the
mouths and babes oft times truths do come’. Or something like that. I reckon
most teachers wouldn't have to search too hard in their daily life to find
examples where this is undoubtedly the case. Children’s somewhat unsettling
habit of being uncannily honest and accurate about things that can make adults
squirm is as endearing as it is terrifying. Then of course there are the times
when they spew absolute nonsense, like the other day in science when one of
them told me with great conviction that eggs melt. Eggs don’t melt kid.
Making the move from secondary to primary has obviously
thrown up challenges. Some of these I was expecting; don’t trip over them;
don’t expect them to get the difference between direct and reported speech the
first time round; don’t worry if sometimes they make weird faces and roll
around on the floor for a bit because fractions aren't that interesting; that
sort of stuff. But some I was less prepared for, even though they seem obvious
in writing; they don’t really get subtext or irony, weirdly; to them it does
matter if someone took their pencil, even if they subsequently gave it back;
whichever way you slice it, fart noises are funny; and more importantly, most
will just say stuff if they are thinking it.
Of course, this isn't limited to primary. Anyone who’s ever
taught in the depths of Y9 will know that it takes some students longer than
others to develop the ol’ brain-mouth filter. It’s just that when it’s a seven
year old telling you that your hair is messy and that you smell of coffee it’s
somehow more disarming, because you know it must be true.
The fact that the change in key stage has also been
accompanied by a change from state to private may also have a bearing on this.
Don’t get me wrong, I don’t pretend to have been a crusading educator of kids from
decaying and anonymous high-rises, steering them through the maze of violence
and poverty that formed their everyday lives, protecting them from the spectres
of gangs and drugs with the shining beacon of education. I taught French in a
relatively leafy suburb of Essex. Not without its challenges obviously, but I’d
be surprised if any of the kids I used to teach wound up in prison, or
releasing a lyrically brilliant but virtually unheard of grime record. Even so,
I think it would be fair to say that most of them didn't have maids. Much
more ‘second car’ than ‘second home’. And their parents had more or less normal
jobs. Jobs that you’d heard of. Stuff like ‘works in a bank, ‘architect’, ‘self-employed
builder’, even ‘teacher’; not stuff like ‘professional footballer’, ‘pro-golfer’,
‘owner of four restaurants and a water park’ or the decidedly shady ‘something
in North Africa’. Anyway point being that perhaps this background has imbued
the students here with even less fear than the average pre-teen - the teenage
years being a state of constant fear of absolutely everything – so emphasising
and honing their ability to point out one’s foibles. But then, that could just
be my liberal guilt talking. And you can’t resent them; they’re eight for
Christ’s sake.
Either way, it took me all of three hours of my fist day to
realise that they calls ‘em like them sees ‘em: ‘Mr Adam, you have purple round
your eyes, you did not sleep well’ (for reasons which are unclear to me, they
drop the surname here but keep the ‘Mr’). She was right; I hadn't slept well,
largely because the next day I was starting a new job in another country in a key stage in which I wasn't trained. Thing is, it’s probably quite a big step for
the average 8 year-old to get their head round this. To her I just looked
knackered, and that’s what she said. Similarly, there was no arguing with the
student the other week who they told me I had sweat under my arms and that
‘maybe I should change my shirt’. It is starting to get hot here.
There is something which should be said about the purple eye
comment which is that, although that day I really hadn't slept well, mostly
it’s just my natural colouring. My eyes are dark, and the rest of my face
maintains a somewhat yellow tinge that has been described variously as
‘Scandinavian’, ‘Mediterranean’, ‘olive’, ‘waxy’, ‘sallow’, ‘ghostly’, and
perhaps least flatteringly of all ‘grey’. In fairness to the kids, adults have
in the past felt compelled to comment on my sunken features. A man in the pub
once walked up to me and quite unexpectedly and not a little aggressively
grabbed my face in both hands and held my head still so he could get a better
look at it. He stared into my eyes for a while. I weighed up whether he was
going to punch me or give me a kiss, and opted eventually for the former. Then
he said simply, ‘You've got very dark eyes. That’s why I was looking at you
earlier on’. I said I hadn't noticed. I had noticed; he’d been looking right at
me for some time. Hence, I suppose, my nickname amongst some of the children - el
vampiro - which emerged after a couple of weeks and, at the height of its
usage, led some children to run away from me down the corridor in ‘fear’,
crying ‘Oh no! It is Mr Vampiro! If he bites you, you will be a vampiro too.’ Thankfully,
it seems to have settled down a little now, as has their habit of drawing
pictures of me on the board in the morning, an exercise whose objective appears
to have been ‘who can draw the picture that looks the least like Mr Adam, or even
a human being’. If this is the case, the prize must surely go to the student
who liked to draw me as a branch of the supermarket chain Mercadona,
sometimes accompanied with an explanatory caption, but sometimes just left for
the viewer to interpret. That was the egg melting kid.
Some comments of course are harder to stomach - or
understand- than others. ‘Slow’ is an accusation that (perhaps appropriately) I
am still struggling to get to grips with; I maintain that ‘old’ is a matter of
perspective; and ‘feo’ is one that we had to have a little chat about.
Some -‘Mr Gum’ for example- are just plain odd. The latest from one Y4 student
is ‘Mr Puffin’. I quite like this one, not least because it comes with a
full-on, head back, ear-to-ear grin, and is so strange that it’s pointless even trying to rationalise it.
However, some do have the ability to reach you in a strange
and unnerving way. ‘Why are you so serious?’ is a question that keeps rolling
around in my head, and one to which I can’t quite seem to find an answer,
although it is probably just that at the time of asking I was trying to teach
maths. It’s a hell of a question nonetheless. It’s a question that can keep you
awake at night, especially when taken apiece with the character description of
me written by one student, which read simply: ‘Mr Adam: tall, weird and sad’. I've been trying to work out whether she meant ‘sad’ as in ‘melancholy’ or,
even worse, ‘sad’ as in ‘Warhammer collection and the novel of the game Halo’.
If the latter, I can take comfort in the fact that this at least really isn't true, although I am able to identify all the flags of the World. Similarly, the
all-purpose ‘bad’ is an adaptable and niggly instrument for all its bluntness. ‘How
many minutes are left of the lesson?’ is another question that if taken the
wrong way can cut through you a bit, and there is a knowing, prophetic tone to
the disarmingly simple ‘Why are you always here?’ that could lead a man to
madness if enough time was given to it.
But then, they’re only kids, just breathing air out of their
mouths. Incidentally, the reason that student was doing a character description
of me is that I appeared in the fantasy story she was writing. I was a gingerbread
man who gets his arm bitten off by the Queen after failing to collect enough
fruit. Apparently there are no unions for gingerbread men. It was an odd sort
of compliment, but one which I took in the spirit in which it was offered;
unknowingly.
Please enjoy below some highlights from the Mr Adam Gallery.
![]() |
| A classic example of the form. |
![]() |
| With Kit-Kat and cheese. |
![]() |
| March 2014 |
![]() |
| Notable for its use of defined limbs. |
![]() |
| 'Tall, weird, sad, crumbly' |





No comments:
Post a Comment